Question Time: Tominey discusses uncontrolled immigration
Sign up for FREE now and never miss the top politics stories again
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Speaking on BBC’s Question Time, The Daily Telegraph’s associate editor branded the conversation around illegal immigration a “toxified debate” on which people are “afraid” to voice their opinoins, however valid they might be. She said that because of Brexit, people are labelled “a racist or a bigot” for supporting the Rwanda deal and the conversation around immigration quickly gets dragged into a “language problem”.
Ms Tominey said: “The trouble with this is it has become a really toxified debate. Labour themselves came up with a scheme to process asylum seekers outside of the EU in 2003 and it was criticised by Human Rights Watch and other organisations.
“Successive governments have found it difficult to put the immigration genie back in the bottle.
“And so in the debate about it, because people are afraid, because of Brexit, about expressing a concern about illegal, uncontrolled immigration and then being branded a racist or a bigot, we then can’t really speak about this without being fearful of our language.
“And there is also a perfectly valid question that people are asking which is why people don’t think they can seek the safe haven they need in France.
Tony Blair said he could not understand the “objection” to sending refugees abroad in 2004 (Image: GETTY )
Boris Johnson told the Commons last week that Labour had in effect engineered the Rwanda policy (Image: GETTY )
She added: “If somebody is in France and they aren’t being persecuted, and then they are being exploited to be put on a barely inflated raft and sent into one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, simply to come to the UK when they already would have been safe in Calais, that is a point of consternation for people.
“But unfortunately, all of the politicking we have witnessed tonight means we can’t solve the issues because we can’t solve the language problem around this discussion.”
The Labour scheme that Ms Tominey referenced was proposed by then-home secretary David Blunkett in 2003 under Tony Blair.
Lord Blunkett reportedly presented his plan to the European Commision to send asylum seekers to foreign processing centres
The scheme was brought up during Prime Minister’s Questions last week by Boris Johnson, who said he was “slightly taken aback” by the criticism of the Rwanda policy.
READ MORE: ZERO dinghies detected just days after Rwanda scheme unveiled [REPORT]
Priti Patel had to tell Labour backbenchers to shut up last week as she explained her policy (Image: GETTY )
Labour Lord Blunkett first proposed the idea of transit processing centres in 2003 (Image: GETTY )
He said: I was slightly taken aback for the Government to be criticised over the policy that we have devised to end the deaths at sea in the Channel as a result of cruel criminal gangs.
“Do you know who proposed that policy first of all, in 2004? It was David Blunkett, who said, yes it was, it was a 21st century solution to the problems of illegal asylum-seeking and immigration.”
In 2004, the home office allegedly held talks with Tanzania to send failed Somali asylum seekers from Britain to Tanzania.
The idea was for the refugees to be housed in the African nation while their applications were processed in the UK.
DON’T MISS: Migrants will fly to Rwanda in ‘private jet’ if protests hit airlines [REVEAL]
Boris is ONLY PM because Britain voted Brexit’ Farage slams border row [REPORT]
Priti Patel’s plan will help solve migrant crisis, says JAMES WHALE [OPINION]
Migrants have still attempted to cross in their masses post-Rwanda announcement (Image: GETTY )
In words eerily similar to Mr Johnson’s, then-Prime Minister Tony Blair said at the time: “I honestly cannot understand the objection to seeing whether it is possible, if people are going to make asylum claims and begin their asylum journey close to the country of origin, to try to process some of those claims there.”
The plan was eventually scrapped by the UK following a report by the Foreign and Commonwealth office that concluded it was no longer pursuing foreign processing centres.
It said: “There was little support [amongst EU member states, third countries and international organisations] for our proposals for transit processing centres which would involve governments sending asylum seekers to centres in third countries in order to have their asylum claims processed.”
However, there is one fundamental difference between the two policies: the Labour policy would have had successful applicants rehoused in the UK, whereas the new Tory regime will see successful applicants remain in Rwanda.